Stand For

Advocacy

Together we bring positive change to emergency response.

Our current advocacy work focuses on four connected topics — psychosocial safety, access to the profession, volunteer rights, and the regulatory gaps that hold all three back.

Advocacy is one of the ways The Spirit of SAR pursues its mission. We research the issues, publish openly, build coalitions, and press for practical change in policy, standards and everyday practice. Below are the four topics we are actively advancing.

1. Psychosocial Safety in SAR

Search and rescue personnel carry psychological load that too often goes unrecognised, unmeasured and unsupported. We advocate for psychologically safe teams — where people can speak up, report hazards and near-misses, ask for help, and be treated as human beings rather than expendable resources.

The Mayday Movement is our flagship initiative under this topic — a public pledge and community campaign for fear-free, psychologically safe response organisations. See The Mayday Movement, Psychology in SAR and Healthy Teams.

2. Breaking and Lowering Barriers to Entry

Search and rescue — and the wider emergency response industry — should not be reachable only by military, government or agency personnel. Civilians, career-changers, mariners, volunteers and people from under-represented backgrounds all have capability to offer. We advocate for accessible training pathways, recognition of prior learning, transparent recruitment, affordable qualifications, and open public education so that anyone who wants to help can find a legitimate route in. See Training and the Water Safety Library.

3. Equal Rights for Volunteers

Volunteers perform the same missions, accept the same risks and meet the same standards as paid responders — yet frequently without equivalent protections, insurance, injury cover, training entitlements, grievance channels or legal standing. We advocate for parity: that volunteer responders be afforded rights and protections comparable to their employed counterparts.

4. Research & Reform of Regulatory Framework Gaps

The first three topics share a root cause: gaps, inconsistencies and silences in the regulatory and standards frameworks that govern SAR. We research where those gaps sit across jurisdictions, publish the findings, and contribute to standards development — including international maritime SAR training standards work — to close them. See Projects and SARticles.

Add your voice

Support an advocacy topic, contribute research, or bring your organisation into the work.

Get in touch